Palbociclib and letrozole in hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer: Predictive response and prognostic factors

Mohamad Ali Salloum, PharmD • October 13, 2022

Share

  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button

I am glad to announce that a new article was published on June 2022 in the journal "Current Problems in Cancer" which I participated in as a co-author. I wish you a joyful reading of the abstract below!

Abstract

CDK 4/6 inhibitors have been yielding propitious results when with hormone therapy in the management of Her2-negative and hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer, Palbociclib being one of the first molecules investigated in this setting. However, the response to CDK4/6 inhibitors is variable. To identify predictive and prognostic factors of response to this therapeutic regimen.

Eligible patients were females with HR+ and Her2- advanced breast cancer, receiving Palbociclib in combination with Letrozole. PFS was the primary endpoint in the evaluation of response to treatment. This survival was then further segregated according to various characteristics: histological (type, grade, hormone receptors), metastatic site, line of treatment, response type at initial assessment, and best response achieved. The data was then processed by two statistical analysis models: Kaplan-Meier and univariate preceding multivariate Cox proportional risks.

Sixty patients were included and followed for a median follow-up duration of 15.98 months. PFS recorded a median of 19.07 months (95% CI=15.43-22.71). PFS had a median of 12.99 months in the absence of progesterone receptors (vs 20.05 months in the case of positive estrogen and progesterone receptors; P = 0.046), a median of 13.02 months in the presence of liver metastases (vs 22.98 months in the absence of liver metastases; P = 0.007), and 15.94 months in the case of second-line and beyond (vs 22.98 months in the case of first-line; P = 0.033). Regarding the Hazard Ratio of progression, we note age (HR 0.941; P = 0.019), liver metastases (HR 2.751; P = 0.051), response at initial evaluation (HR<1; P < 0.001) and best response (HR<1; P = 0.003). PFS reached similar figures to those of international studies. The absence of progesterone receptors, the presence of liver metastases, and use as second-line or beyond are associated with a reduced median PFS. One year age increase (protective factor), liver metastases (risk factor), response at initial evaluation, and best response achieved are identified as the most predictive factors of the response to this treatment regimen and of the progression risk.

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

The article was in collaboration with:

Khalil El Gharib (1)Walid Macaron (2)Joseph Kattan (2)Mohamad Ali Salloum (3)Fadi Farhat (3)Marianne Smith (4)Fadi El Karak (2)

Affiliations

1) Department of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York. Electronic address: khalil.gharib@outlook.com.

2) Department of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

3) Hammoud Hospital University Medical Center, Saida, Lebanon.

4) Department of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York.


Resources:

1) Gharib KE, Macaron W, Kattan J, Salloum MA, Farhat F, Smith M, Karak FE. Palbociclib and letrozole in hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer: Predictive response and prognostic factors. Curr Probl Cancer. 2022 Jun;46(3):100859. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100859. Epub 2022 Mar 28. PMID: 35378469.

List of Services

    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD

    Mohamad Ali Salloum LinkedIn Profile

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.

    Share

    Recent articles:

    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD April 5, 2026
    References: Biological Psychiatry Study. HDAC5 limits expression of Scn4b and regulates drug memory formation and relapse. ScienceDaily. 2025. 1 Fang Y, Sun Y, Liu Y, et al. Neurobiological mechanisms and clinical treatment of addiction. Psychoradiology. 2022;2(4):180189. 2 Palombo P. Neurobiology of Substance Use Disorders. Springer; 2025. 3 
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD April 3, 2026
    How scientific models explain the roots and progression of addictive behavior
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD April 1, 2026
    References: Karimpourvazifehkhorani A, Hekmati I. Habit loop in addictive behaviors formation among adolescents: The mediating role of impulsivity. Curr Psychol. 2025;44:4313–4325. Simón Márquez MM, Fernández Gea S, Molero Jurado MM, et al. Addictions and risk behaviors in adolescence: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2025;16. Legends Recovery. The Science Behind Habit Formation and Breaking Addictive Patterns. 2025. Buabang EK, Donegan KR, Rafei P, Gillan CM. Leveraging cognitive neuroscience for making and breaking real-world habits. Trends Cogn Sci. 2025;29(1):41–59. Aguilar-Yamuza B, Trenados Y, Herruzo C, et al. A systematic review of treatment for impulsivity and compulsivity. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15. Science News Today. Why Habits Stick: The Hidden Psychology of Habit Formation. 2025.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD March 30, 2026
    References: Peng Z, Jia Q, Mao J, et al. Neurotransmitters crosstalk and regulation in the reward circuit of subjects with behavioral addiction . Front Psychiatry. 2024;15. 2 Walid R. The Impact of Addiction on the Brain’s Reward Circuitry, And How This Affects the Motivation and Decision-Making Processes . 2025. 3 Parra-Abarca J, Palacios-Pérez HB, Baldivia-Noyola P, et al. The relation between the dopaminergic system, drug addiction, and brain structures related to reward behaviors and decision-making . Rev Mex Neurocienc. 2025. 4 Penn LPS Online. Neuroscience and addiction: Unraveling the brain's reward system . 2025. 1 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Hijacking the Brain’s Reward System: The Neuroscience Behind Addiction . 2025.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD March 28, 2026
    References: Aggarwal D, Naik J, Lindquist DH. Biphasic Model of Addiction: Neurobehavioral Adaptations . Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2025;12:25. 1 Blithikioti C, Fried EI, Albanese E, Field M, Cristea IA. Reevaluating the brain disease model of addiction . Lancet Psychiatry. 2025;12(6):469–474. 2 Blithikioti C, Fried EI, Albanese E, Field M, Cristea IA. Reevaluating the BrainDisease Model of Addiction (Accepted Version). University of Sheffield; 2025. Unterrainer HF. Addiction, attachment, and the brain: a focused review of empirical findings and future directions . Front Hum Neurosci. 2025;19. 3 Vaswani M. Neurobiology of Addiction . Addiction Behavioral Conference 2025. Magnus Group. 
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD March 24, 2026
    This guide breaks down why your body reacts the way it does, how misinterpretation fuels anxiety, and the CBT tools designed to help you understand (and stop fearing) your own physical sensations.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD March 22, 2026
    This article explains why avoidance is so powerful, how it silently shapes your emotions and behaviors, and evidence‑based strategies that help you break the cycle.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD March 20, 2026
    Are you having Negative Automatic Thoughts (NATs)? We got you 💆‍♂️
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD March 18, 2026
    Learn how to break the vicious cycle by addressing your behaviors!
    More Posts