Why VCT Scans Can’t Be Used on Dogs?

Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD • October 6, 2024

Share

  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button

Volumetric Computed Tomography (VCT) scans have revolutionized medical imaging for humans, providing detailed 3D images of the body with minimal discomfort. However, when it comes to our furry friends, VCT scans aren’t typically used. Here’s why: 


1) Anatomical Differences 


The primary reason VCT scans aren’t used on dogs is due to the significant anatomical differences between humans and dogs. VCT scanners are calibrated and designed to capture human body structures accurately. Dogs, on the other hand, have different bone densities, organ placements, and overall body structures that might not be accurately captured by a VCT scanner designed for humans. This can lead to less precise images and potentially inaccurate diagnoses. 


2) Size and Positioning 


VCT scanners are built to accommodate the size and positioning of human patients. Humans generally have a standard size and shape that these machines are designed to handle. Dogs, however, come in a wide variety of sizes and shapes, from tiny Chihuahuas to large Great Danes. Positioning a dog correctly in a machine designed for humans can be challenging and may not yield the best results. 


3) Motion and Sedation 


One of the key requirements for a successful VCT scan is that the patient remains still during the procedure. While humans can follow instructions to stay still, dogs often need to be sedated to achieve the same level of stillness. Sedation in animals can be more complex and carries its own risks, especially in a machine not designed for their use. This adds an additional layer of complexity to using VCT scans on dogs. 


4) Specialized Veterinary Equipment 


Veterinary medicine has its own set of specialized imaging equipment, such as veterinary-specific CT and MRI machines. These machines are tailored to the needs of animals and are designed to capture the unique anatomical details of dogs and other animals. They provide the necessary adjustments and calibrations to ensure accurate and safe imaging for veterinary patients. 


5) Radiation Safety 


The radiation dose and safety protocols for VCT scans are established based on human studies. Using these machines on dogs without proper adjustments could pose unnecessary risks. Veterinary-specific imaging equipment is designed with the appropriate safety measures for animals, ensuring that they receive the correct amount of radiation for accurate imaging without undue risk. 


BUT WHAT CAN WE USE TO SCAN OUR FURRY FRIENDS?!



There are several imaging techniques specifically designed for veterinary use that can effectively scan dogs. Here are some of the most common ones: 


1. X-rays (Radiography) 


X-rays are widely used in veterinary practices to create images of bones, organs, and other internal structures. They are particularly useful for detecting fractures, tumors, and foreign objects


2. Ultrasound (Ultrasonography) 


Ultrasound uses sound waves to create images of the inside of the body. It’s commonly used to examine soft tissues, such as organs and blood vessels, and is particularly useful for diagnosing conditions like heart disease and abdominal issues


3. CT Scans (Computed Tomography) 


CT scans provide detailed cross-sectional images of the body and are useful for diagnosing complex conditions, such as tumors, internal injuries, and bone disorders. Veterinary-specific CT scanners are designed to accommodate the anatomical differences of animals


4. MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) 


MRI uses magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images of soft tissues, such as the brain, spinal cord, and muscles. It’s particularly useful for diagnosing neurological conditions and soft tissue injuries. Like CT scans, MRIs require the dog to be sedated or anesthetized to ensure they remain still during the procedure.


5. Nuclear Medicine 


This technique involves the use of small amounts of radioactive material to diagnose and treat diseases. It can provide information about the function of organs and tissues, which is useful for diagnosing conditions like cancer and thyroid disorders


Conclusion 


While VCT technology is advanced and highly effective for human diagnostics, veterinary medicine relies on equipment specifically designed for animals to ensure accurate and safe imaging. The anatomical differences, size and positioning challenges, need for sedation, and radiation safety concerns all contribute to why VCT scans aren’t typically used on dogs. Instead, veterinarians use specialized imaging tools that are better suited to capture the unique details of our beloved pets, ensuring they receive the best possible care. 

 



List of Services

    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD

    Mohamad Ali Salloum LinkedIn Profile

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.

    Share

    Recent articles:

    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 23, 2026
    Why does this always happen?
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 21, 2026
    Discover the best ways to learn new skills
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 19, 2026
    Stuck in your head? Discover why overthinking feels productive, how it sabotages your performance, and simple ways to shift into real action.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 17, 2026
    References: Wood W, Quinn JM, Kashy DA. Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. J Pers Soc Psychol . 2002;83(6):1281–1297. Wood W, Neal DT. The habitual consumer. J Consum Psychol . 2009;19(4):579–592. Neal DT, Wood W, Labrecque JS, Lally P. How do habits guide behavior? Perceived and actual triggers of habits in daily life. J Exp Soc Psychol . 2012;48(2):492–498. Wood W, Mazar A, Neal DT. Habits and goals in human behavior: Separate but interacting systems. Perspect Psychol Sci . 2021;16(1):1–16. Graybiel AM. Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu Rev Neurosci . 2008;31:359–387. Smith KS, Graybiel AM. Habit formation. Dialogues Clin Neurosci . 2016;18(1):33–43. Yin HH, Knowlton BJ. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2006;7(6):464–476. Graybiel AM. The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiol Learn Mem . 1998;70(1–2):119–136. Schultz W. Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues Clin Neurosci . 2016;18(1):23–32. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science . 1997;275(5306):1593–1599. Nasser HM, Calu DJ, Schoenbaum G, Sharpe MJ. The dopamine prediction error: Contributions to associative models of reward learning. Front Psychol . 2017;8:244. Kahnt T, Schoenbaum G. The curious case of dopaminergic prediction errors and learning associative information beyond value. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2025;26:169–178. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol . 2010;40(6):998–1009. American Psychological Association. Harnessing the power of habits. Monitor Psychol . 2020;51(8):78–83.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 15, 2026
    References: Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol . 2012;63:1–29. Chai WJ, Abd Hamid AI, Malin Abdullah J. Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: a review. Front Psychol . 2018;9:401. Rogers RD, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen . 1995;124(2):207–231. Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform . 2001;27(4):763–797. Garner KG, Dux PE. Knowledge generalization and the costs of multitasking. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2023;24:98–112. Zhou X, Lei X. Wandering minds with wandering brain networks. Neurosci Bull . 2018;34(6):1017–1028. Sorella S, Crescentini C, Matiz A, et al. Resting‑state default mode network variability predicts spontaneous mind‑wandering. Front Hum Neurosci . 2025;19:1515902. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci . 1988;12(2):257–285. 
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 13, 2026
    Why do we procrastinate even when tasks matter most? Discover the emotional roots of procrastination and how to stop
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 11, 2026
    Confidence and self-esteem are often confused but are psychologically distinct. Learn how they differ, how each develops, and why understanding both matters for real growth.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 9, 2026
    Confidence isn’t about eliminating fear—it’s about acting despite it. Discover how courage, discomfort, and psychological growth build real confidence over time.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 7, 2026
    References: McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med . 2014;371(11):993–1004. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med . 2007;357:2109–2122. Kastelein JJP, Akdim F, Stroes ESG, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:1431–1443. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:2545–2559. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. N Engl J Med . 1991;324:781–788. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. N Engl J Med . 2020;383:1413–1424. Ioannidis JPA. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: are we being misled? BMJ . 2013;346:f314.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 4, 2026
    References: Wager TD, Atlas LY. The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2015;16(7):403‑18. Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F, Pagnini F. Placebo and nocebo effects associated with pharmacological interventions: an umbrella review. BMJ Open . 2023;13:e077243. Colloca L, Finniss D. Nocebo effects, patient‑clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes. JAMA . 2012;307(6):567‑8. Howard JP, Wood FA, Finegold JA, et al. Side effect patterns in a blinded, randomized trial of statin, placebo, and no treatment. N Engl J Med . 2021;385(23):2180‑9. Penson PE, Mancini GBJ, Toth PP, et al. Introducing the “drucebo” effect in statin therapy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle . 2018;9(6):1023‑33. Barnes K, Faasse K, Geers AL, et al. Can positive framing reduce nocebo side effects? Front Pharmacol . 2019;10:167. Caliskan EB, Bingel U, Kunkel A. Translating knowledge on placebo and nocebo effects into clinical practice. Pain Rep . 2024;9(2):e1142. von Wernsdorff M, Loef M, Tuschen‑Caffier B, Schmidt S. Effects of open‑label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Sci Rep . 2021;11:3855.
    More Posts