10 Medications that were recalled by the FDA

Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD • September 2, 2024

Share

  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of medications. Despite rigorous testing, some drugs are recalled post-approval due to unforeseen adverse effects. This essay explores ten such medications, detailing the reasons behind their recalls.


1) Zantac (ranitidine): 


In April 2020, the FDA requested the recall of all prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) ranitidine drugs, including Zantac, due to the presence of a probable human carcinogen called N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in the medications. NDMA is a known environmental contaminant and found in water and foods, including meats, dairy products, and vegetables, but it is not expected to cause harm when ingested in low levels. However, when exposed to higher levels over long periods of time, it may increase the risk of cancer.


Story:


N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) was discovered in Zantac (ranitidine) during routine testing by the FDA and other regulatory agencies. The discovery process involved several key steps:


  1. Initial Detection: The FDA began testing ranitidine products after reports of NDMA contamination in other medications. The initial tests revealed that NDMA levels in ranitidine increased over time and with exposure to higher temperatures.
  2. Chemical Breakdown: It was found that the active ingredient in Zantac, ranitidine, can break down into smaller molecules under certain conditions. These smaller molecules can then combine to form NDMA.
  3. Advanced Testing Methods: Laboratories used advanced analytical methods, such as liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS), to detect and quantify NDMA levels in ranitidineSome tests involved heating the product to simulate conditions during storage and transport, which showed significant NDMA formation.


2) Metformin:


Several manufacturers of metformin, a medication used to treat type 2 diabetes, have issued voluntary recalls due to the presence of a possible carcinogen called N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in the medication. The levels of NDMA found in the recalled medications were above the acceptable daily intake limit set by the FDA.


Story:


N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) was discovered in metformin during routine testing and investigations by the FDA. The agency began testing metformin products after reports of NDMA contamination in other medications. The testing revealed that NDMA was present in the finished metformin tablets, but not in the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) themselves

.

This suggests that NDMA may form during the manufacturing process or storage of the finished product1The FDA used advanced analytical methods, such as liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS), to detect and quantify NDMA levels in metforminAs a result, several lots of extended-release metformin were recalled to ensure patient safety.


3) Losartan:


In 2019, several lots of losartan, a medication used to treat high blood pressure, were recalled due to the presence of a possible carcinogen called N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) in the medication. The levels of NDEA found in the recalled medications were above the acceptable daily intake limit set by the FDA.


Story:


N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) was discovered in Losartan during routine testing and investigations by regulatory agencies like the FDA. This impurity, along with others like N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-Nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA), was found in the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) used to manufacture the drug.


The contamination occurred due to a chemical reaction during the manufacturing process of the API. Specifically, suppliers in India and China inadvertently produced contaminated ingredients, which were then used by pharmaceutical companies to produce the final drug productsThis led to the recall of several lots of Losartan to ensure patient safety.


4) Valsartan:


In 2018, several lots of valsartan, another medication used to treat high blood pressure, were recalled due to the presence of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) in the medication. The levels of NDMA and NDEA found in the recalled medications were above the acceptable daily intake limits set by the FDA.


5) Ibuprofen:


In 2018, several lots of liquid ibuprofen for infants and children were recalled due to the potential risk of higher concentrations of the medication. The recall was initiated by the manufacturer, Tris Pharma, after receiving customer complaints about the medication having higher concentrations of ibuprofen than listed on the label. Parents and caregivers were advised to stop using the recalled product and to contact their healthcare provider if their child had experienced any adverse effects. They were also instructed to return the product to the place of purchase for a refund.


Story:


  1. Higher Concentration Levels: Some units from the recalled batches were found to contain ibuprofen levels up to 10% above the specified limit. This could lead to infants receiving a higher dose than intended.
  2. Health Risks: Overdosing on ibuprofen can cause several adverse effects, especially in infants, including:
  • Gastrointestinal Issues: Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain.
  • Renal Injury: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen can cause kidney damage, particularly in young children.
  • Other Symptoms: Drowsiness, headache, and in severe cases, respiratory depression and coma.



6) Digoxin:


In 2017, several lots of digoxin, a medication used to treat heart failure and irregular heartbeats, were recalled due to the potential risk of incorrect dosing. The recall was initiated by the manufacturer, Westminster Pharmaceuticals, after discovering that some bottles may have contained tablets with twice the approved strength.


Story:


There was a Label Mix-Up, where ottles labeled as 0.125 mg contained 0.25 mg tablets, and vice versa.




This recall was a precautionary measure to ensure patient safety and prevent any adverse health effects.


7) OxyContin:


In 2015, OxyContin was not specifically recalled, but there were significant developments related to its formulation and regulatory scrutiny:


  1. Reformulation: Purdue Pharma, the manufacturer of OxyContin, had reformulated the drug to make it more abuse-deterrent. This new version was designed to be harder to crush, snort, or inject, which are common methods of abuse.
  2. Regulatory Review: In 2015, the FDA was supposed to review follow-up data on the effectiveness of this reformulated version in reducing abuse. However, Purdue Pharma pulled its application to update OxyContin’s label with new information on abuse, stating that they needed more time to analyze the data.



As of 2024, Purdue Pharma has not reapplied to the FDA to update OxyContin’s label with new information on abuse deterrence. The company has been involved in ongoing legal and regulatory challenges, including a recent Supreme Court decision rejecting a nationwide settlement related to the opioid crisis.


Public Health Concerns: There were ongoing concerns about the effectiveness of the reformulated OxyContin in actually reducing abuse and addiction rates. The FDA and other health experts were closely monitoring the situation.



8) Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate):


In 2013, several lots of Tamiflu, a medication used to treat the flu, were recalled due to potential packaging defects that could cause the medication to spoil. The recall was initiated by the manufacturer, Roche, after discovering that the Tamiflu capsules had a defect that allowed moisture to enter the packaging, potentially causing the medication to spoil.


9) Levothyroxine:


In 2013, several lots of levothyroxine, a medication used to treat hypothyroidism, were recalled due to a labeling error that resulted in the incorrect strength being listed on the packaging. The recall was initiated by the manufacturer, Lannett Company, after discovering that some bottles contained tablets with a different strength than listed on the label.


10) HydroChloroThiazide (HCT):


In 2018, there were two notable recalls involving hydrochlorothiazide:


  1. Label Mix-Up: Accord Healthcare issued a recall for one lot of Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets USP, 12.5 mg, because bottles labeled as hydrochlorothiazide were found to contain spironolactone tablets instead. This mix-up could lead to patients receiving the wrong medication, which could have serious health implications.
  2. Contamination with NDEA: Teva Pharmaceuticals recalled several lots of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination tablets due to the detection of N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), a probable human carcinogen, in the valsartan component. This impurity was found in the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufactured by Mylan India.


Conclusion:


The recall of these medications underscores the importance of continuous monitoring and post-marketing surveillance to ensure drug safety. While these recalls highlight the potential risks, they also demonstrate the FDA’s commitment to protecting public health.


List of Services

    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD

    Mohamad Ali Salloum LinkedIn Profile

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.

    Share

    Recent articles:

    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 21, 2026
    Discover the best ways to learn new skills
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 19, 2026
    Stuck in your head? Discover why overthinking feels productive, how it sabotages your performance, and simple ways to shift into real action.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 17, 2026
    References: Wood W, Quinn JM, Kashy DA. Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. J Pers Soc Psychol . 2002;83(6):1281–1297. Wood W, Neal DT. The habitual consumer. J Consum Psychol . 2009;19(4):579–592. Neal DT, Wood W, Labrecque JS, Lally P. How do habits guide behavior? Perceived and actual triggers of habits in daily life. J Exp Soc Psychol . 2012;48(2):492–498. Wood W, Mazar A, Neal DT. Habits and goals in human behavior: Separate but interacting systems. Perspect Psychol Sci . 2021;16(1):1–16. Graybiel AM. Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu Rev Neurosci . 2008;31:359–387. Smith KS, Graybiel AM. Habit formation. Dialogues Clin Neurosci . 2016;18(1):33–43. Yin HH, Knowlton BJ. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2006;7(6):464–476. Graybiel AM. The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiol Learn Mem . 1998;70(1–2):119–136. Schultz W. Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues Clin Neurosci . 2016;18(1):23–32. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science . 1997;275(5306):1593–1599. Nasser HM, Calu DJ, Schoenbaum G, Sharpe MJ. The dopamine prediction error: Contributions to associative models of reward learning. Front Psychol . 2017;8:244. Kahnt T, Schoenbaum G. The curious case of dopaminergic prediction errors and learning associative information beyond value. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2025;26:169–178. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol . 2010;40(6):998–1009. American Psychological Association. Harnessing the power of habits. Monitor Psychol . 2020;51(8):78–83.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 15, 2026
    References: Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol . 2012;63:1–29. Chai WJ, Abd Hamid AI, Malin Abdullah J. Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: a review. Front Psychol . 2018;9:401. Rogers RD, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen . 1995;124(2):207–231. Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform . 2001;27(4):763–797. Garner KG, Dux PE. Knowledge generalization and the costs of multitasking. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2023;24:98–112. Zhou X, Lei X. Wandering minds with wandering brain networks. Neurosci Bull . 2018;34(6):1017–1028. Sorella S, Crescentini C, Matiz A, et al. Resting‑state default mode network variability predicts spontaneous mind‑wandering. Front Hum Neurosci . 2025;19:1515902. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci . 1988;12(2):257–285. 
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 13, 2026
    Why do we procrastinate even when tasks matter most? Discover the emotional roots of procrastination and how to stop
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 11, 2026
    Confidence and self-esteem are often confused but are psychologically distinct. Learn how they differ, how each develops, and why understanding both matters for real growth.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 9, 2026
    Confidence isn’t about eliminating fear—it’s about acting despite it. Discover how courage, discomfort, and psychological growth build real confidence over time.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 7, 2026
    References: McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med . 2014;371(11):993–1004. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med . 2007;357:2109–2122. Kastelein JJP, Akdim F, Stroes ESG, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:1431–1443. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:2545–2559. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. N Engl J Med . 1991;324:781–788. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. N Engl J Med . 2020;383:1413–1424. Ioannidis JPA. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: are we being misled? BMJ . 2013;346:f314.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 4, 2026
    References: Wager TD, Atlas LY. The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2015;16(7):403‑18. Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F, Pagnini F. Placebo and nocebo effects associated with pharmacological interventions: an umbrella review. BMJ Open . 2023;13:e077243. Colloca L, Finniss D. Nocebo effects, patient‑clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes. JAMA . 2012;307(6):567‑8. Howard JP, Wood FA, Finegold JA, et al. Side effect patterns in a blinded, randomized trial of statin, placebo, and no treatment. N Engl J Med . 2021;385(23):2180‑9. Penson PE, Mancini GBJ, Toth PP, et al. Introducing the “drucebo” effect in statin therapy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle . 2018;9(6):1023‑33. Barnes K, Faasse K, Geers AL, et al. Can positive framing reduce nocebo side effects? Front Pharmacol . 2019;10:167. Caliskan EB, Bingel U, Kunkel A. Translating knowledge on placebo and nocebo effects into clinical practice. Pain Rep . 2024;9(2):e1142. von Wernsdorff M, Loef M, Tuschen‑Caffier B, Schmidt S. Effects of open‑label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Sci Rep . 2021;11:3855.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 4, 2026
    References: Zaniletti I, Larson DR, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Maradit Kremers H. How to distinguish correlation from causation in orthopaedic research. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(4):634–637. Rush J, Ajami M, Look KA, Margolis A. Statistics review part 10: causality and confounding. J Pharm Soc Wis. 2014;17(1):45–52. Koopmans E, Schiller C. Understanding causation in healthcare: an introduction to critical realism. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(8–9):1207–1214. Kahlert J, Gribsholt SB, Gammelager H, Dekkers OM, Luta G. Control of confounding in the analysis phase – an overview for clinicians. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:195–204. Shi AX, Zivich PN, Chu H. A comprehensive review and tutorial on confounding adjustment methods for estimating treatment effects using observational data. Appl Sci (Basel). 2024;14(9):3662. Gao Y, Xiang L, Yi H, Song J, Sun D, Xu B, et al. Confounder adjustment in observational studies investigating multiple risk factors: a methodological study. BMC Med. 2025;23:132. Ho FK, Brown J, Galwey NW. Regression adjustment for causal inference. BMJ Med. 2025;4:e000816. Correia LCL, Mascarenhas RF, Menezes FSC, Oliveira Junior JS, Vaccarino V, Ross JS, et al. Confounder selection in observational studies in high‑impact medical and epidemiological journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(7):e2524176.
    More Posts