Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.
Understanding Root Cause Analysis: The 5 Whys and Fishbone method
Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD • February 10, 2026
Share
When problems happen in clinical research—or any industry—the worst thing we can do is fix only the surface issues.
Real quality improvement comes from understanding why the problem happened in the first place.
That’s where Root Cause Analysis (RCA) tools come in.
Two of the most widely used and easy-to-learn RCA tools are:
The 5 Whys
The Fishbone Diagram (Ishikawa Method)
Both methods help you dig deeper than the symptoms, find the real cause, and prevent the problem from coming back.
🧠 1. The 5 Whys Method
The 5 Whys is exactly what it sounds like:
You ask “Why?” several times (usually 5) until you reach the root cause.
It’s simple. It’s powerful. And it prevents misleading “quick fixes.”
✔ How It Works
- State the problem clearly
- Ask why it happened
- Take the answer and ask “why” again
- Repeat until you uncover the true root cause
- Create corrective and preventive actions
🔍 5 Whys Example (Clinical Research Scenario) — expand
Problem:
The site failed to report an SAE (Serious Adverse Event) within 24 hours.
Why #1:
The coordinator didn’t notice the hospitalization note.
→ Why?
Why #2:
Because the source documents were not reviewed for AEs that day.
→ Why?
Why #3:
Because the coordinator is covering multiple studies and was overwhelmed.
→ Why?
Why #4:
Because there is no workload distribution or backup assigned.
→ Why?
Why #5:
Because the site lacks an SOP for daily AE review and staffing backup.
🎯 Root Cause:
No structured process or backup for reviewing AEs daily.
✨ What this reveals:
The real issue is NOT that the coordinator “forgot”;
it’s a system weakness in staffing and workflow.
🐟 2. The Fishbone Diagram (Ishikawa Method)
The Fishbone method helps you brainstorm possible causes by categorizing them.
When drawn, it looks like a fish skeleton—hence the name.
It's incredibly useful when the problem is complex and may have multiple causes.
✔ The Six Main Fishbone Categories
Most industries use these standard six:
- People – training, workload, roles
- Process – SOPs, workflows, inefficiencies
- Materials – forms, documents, supplies
- Equipment – devices, software, temperature monitors
- Environment – site conditions, distractions, space
- Management – oversight, leadership, expectations
You list the problem at the “head of the fish”
Then brainstorm causes under each category.
🔍 Fishbone Example (Clinical Scenario) — expand
Problem:
Deviation: Visit performed outside the protocol window.
Let’s brainstorm the possible causes:
People
- Coordinator miscalculated the window
- Staff overloaded with multiple duties
Process
- No visit planning checklist
- No SOP for scheduling visits
Materials
- Manual paper calendar used
- No digital reminders
Equipment
- EDC calendar not used
- Scheduling software outdated
Environment
- Busy clinic leading to interruptions
- Frequent rescheduling of appointments
Management
- No oversight of upcoming visits
- PI not reviewing patient trackers
🎯 Root Cause after analysis:
Dependence on unreliable manual methods for scheduling visits.
✨ Solution:
Implement validated scheduling tools, staff training, and oversight checks.
🆚 5 Whys vs Fishbone: When to Use Each
Tool
Best for
Strengths
5 Whys
Simple problems with a direct cause
Fast, easy, reveals hidden reasons
Fishbone
Complex or multi-factor issues
Organized brainstorming, visual, thorough
Often both are used together:
Start with a Fishbone to brainstorm → Use 5 Whys to drill into the strongest cause.
⚙️ Why Every CRA Should Master These Tools
CRAs constantly encounter:
- protocol deviations
- consent issues
- missing data
- late reporting
- documentation errors
- IP temperature excursions
To prevent repeat issues, CRAs must be able to:
- ask strong RCA questions
- guide sites into deeper thinking
- help sites identify true root causes
- assess if CAPAs are realistic and effective
These tools help CRAs move from surface monitoring → to quality-driven oversight.
📘 Practical Tips for CRAs
- Don’t accept “human error” as a cause
- Encourage sites to avoid blame and focus on systems
- Use probing questions (“Walk me through your workflow…”)
- Make CAPAs specific, measurable, and assignable
- Revisit root causes during follow-up visits
📝 Mini Quiz — Test Your Knowledge
1.
The 5 Whys method is mainly used to:
2.
The Fishbone method is useful when:
3.
In the 5 Whys, asking “Why?” repeatedly helps:
4.
Which is not a Fishbone category?
5.
A CRA can use root cause analysis to:
List of Services
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD
Share
Recent articles:
How modern psychotherapy, neurosciencebased interventions, and personalized medicine are reshaping addiction treatment
How substance use progresses from experimentation to compulsive addiction.
How emotional dysregulation, traumatic experiences, and chronic stress shape vulnerability to addiction.
References: Biological Psychiatry Study. HDAC5 limits expression of Scn4b and regulates drug memory formation and relapse. ScienceDaily. 2025. 1 Fang Y, Sun Y, Liu Y, et al. Neurobiological mechanisms and clinical treatment of addiction. Psychoradiology. 2022;2(4):180189. 2 Palombo P. Neurobiology of Substance Use Disorders. Springer; 2025. 3
How scientific models explain the roots and progression of addictive behavior
References: Karimpourvazifehkhorani A, Hekmati I. Habit loop in addictive behaviors formation among adolescents: The mediating role of impulsivity. Curr Psychol. 2025;44:4313–4325. Simón Márquez MM, Fernández Gea S, Molero Jurado MM, et al. Addictions and risk behaviors in adolescence: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2025;16. Legends Recovery. The Science Behind Habit Formation and Breaking Addictive Patterns. 2025. Buabang EK, Donegan KR, Rafei P, Gillan CM. Leveraging cognitive neuroscience for making and breaking real-world habits. Trends Cogn Sci. 2025;29(1):41–59. Aguilar-Yamuza B, Trenados Y, Herruzo C, et al. A systematic review of treatment for impulsivity and compulsivity. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15. Science News Today. Why Habits Stick: The Hidden Psychology of Habit Formation. 2025.
References: Peng Z, Jia Q, Mao J, et al. Neurotransmitters crosstalk and regulation in the reward circuit of subjects with behavioral addiction . Front Psychiatry. 2024;15. 2 Walid R. The Impact of Addiction on the Brain’s Reward Circuitry, And How This Affects the Motivation and Decision-Making Processes . 2025. 3 Parra-Abarca J, Palacios-Pérez HB, Baldivia-Noyola P, et al. The relation between the dopaminergic system, drug addiction, and brain structures related to reward behaviors and decision-making . Rev Mex Neurocienc. 2025. 4 Penn LPS Online. Neuroscience and addiction: Unraveling the brain's reward system . 2025. 1 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Hijacking the Brain’s Reward System: The Neuroscience Behind Addiction . 2025.
References: Aggarwal D, Naik J, Lindquist DH. Biphasic Model of Addiction: Neurobehavioral Adaptations . Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2025;12:25. 1 Blithikioti C, Fried EI, Albanese E, Field M, Cristea IA. Reevaluating the brain disease model of addiction . Lancet Psychiatry. 2025;12(6):469–474. 2 Blithikioti C, Fried EI, Albanese E, Field M, Cristea IA. Reevaluating the BrainDisease Model of Addiction (Accepted Version). University of Sheffield; 2025. Unterrainer HF. Addiction, attachment, and the brain: a focused review of empirical findings and future directions . Front Hum Neurosci. 2025;19. 3 Vaswani M. Neurobiology of Addiction . Addiction Behavioral Conference 2025. Magnus Group.
This guide breaks down why your body reacts the way it does, how misinterpretation fuels anxiety, and the CBT tools designed to help you understand (and stop fearing) your own physical sensations.