Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.
Understanding Root Cause Analysis: The 5 Whys and Fishbone method
Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD • February 10, 2026
Share
When problems happen in clinical research—or any industry—the worst thing we can do is fix only the surface issues.
Real quality improvement comes from understanding why the problem happened in the first place.
That’s where Root Cause Analysis (RCA) tools come in.
Two of the most widely used and easy-to-learn RCA tools are:
The 5 Whys
The Fishbone Diagram (Ishikawa Method)
Both methods help you dig deeper than the symptoms, find the real cause, and prevent the problem from coming back.
🧠 1. The 5 Whys Method
The 5 Whys is exactly what it sounds like:
You ask “Why?” several times (usually 5) until you reach the root cause.
It’s simple. It’s powerful. And it prevents misleading “quick fixes.”
✔ How It Works
- State the problem clearly
- Ask why it happened
- Take the answer and ask “why” again
- Repeat until you uncover the true root cause
- Create corrective and preventive actions
🔍 5 Whys Example (Clinical Research Scenario) — expand
Problem:
The site failed to report an SAE (Serious Adverse Event) within 24 hours.
Why #1:
The coordinator didn’t notice the hospitalization note.
→ Why?
Why #2:
Because the source documents were not reviewed for AEs that day.
→ Why?
Why #3:
Because the coordinator is covering multiple studies and was overwhelmed.
→ Why?
Why #4:
Because there is no workload distribution or backup assigned.
→ Why?
Why #5:
Because the site lacks an SOP for daily AE review and staffing backup.
🎯 Root Cause:
No structured process or backup for reviewing AEs daily.
✨ What this reveals:
The real issue is NOT that the coordinator “forgot”;
it’s a system weakness in staffing and workflow.
🐟 2. The Fishbone Diagram (Ishikawa Method)
The Fishbone method helps you brainstorm possible causes by categorizing them.
When drawn, it looks like a fish skeleton—hence the name.
It's incredibly useful when the problem is complex and may have multiple causes.
✔ The Six Main Fishbone Categories
Most industries use these standard six:
- People – training, workload, roles
- Process – SOPs, workflows, inefficiencies
- Materials – forms, documents, supplies
- Equipment – devices, software, temperature monitors
- Environment – site conditions, distractions, space
- Management – oversight, leadership, expectations
You list the problem at the “head of the fish”
Then brainstorm causes under each category.
🔍 Fishbone Example (Clinical Scenario) — expand
Problem:
Deviation: Visit performed outside the protocol window.
Let’s brainstorm the possible causes:
People
- Coordinator miscalculated the window
- Staff overloaded with multiple duties
Process
- No visit planning checklist
- No SOP for scheduling visits
Materials
- Manual paper calendar used
- No digital reminders
Equipment
- EDC calendar not used
- Scheduling software outdated
Environment
- Busy clinic leading to interruptions
- Frequent rescheduling of appointments
Management
- No oversight of upcoming visits
- PI not reviewing patient trackers
🎯 Root Cause after analysis:
Dependence on unreliable manual methods for scheduling visits.
✨ Solution:
Implement validated scheduling tools, staff training, and oversight checks.
🆚 5 Whys vs Fishbone: When to Use Each
Tool
Best for
Strengths
5 Whys
Simple problems with a direct cause
Fast, easy, reveals hidden reasons
Fishbone
Complex or multi-factor issues
Organized brainstorming, visual, thorough
Often both are used together:
Start with a Fishbone to brainstorm → Use 5 Whys to drill into the strongest cause.
⚙️ Why Every CRA Should Master These Tools
CRAs constantly encounter:
- protocol deviations
- consent issues
- missing data
- late reporting
- documentation errors
- IP temperature excursions
To prevent repeat issues, CRAs must be able to:
- ask strong RCA questions
- guide sites into deeper thinking
- help sites identify true root causes
- assess if CAPAs are realistic and effective
These tools help CRAs move from surface monitoring → to quality-driven oversight.
📘 Practical Tips for CRAs
- Don’t accept “human error” as a cause
- Encourage sites to avoid blame and focus on systems
- Use probing questions (“Walk me through your workflow…”)
- Make CAPAs specific, measurable, and assignable
- Revisit root causes during follow-up visits
📝 Mini Quiz — Test Your Knowledge
1.
The 5 Whys method is mainly used to:
2.
The Fishbone method is useful when:
3.
In the 5 Whys, asking “Why?” repeatedly helps:
4.
Which is not a Fishbone category?
5.
A CRA can use root cause analysis to:
List of Services
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD
Share
Recent articles:
A clear, practical guide to CAPA for Clinical Research Associates—covering corrective and preventive actions, real‑world scenarios, and an interactive quiz to reinforce learning.
Boost your health with a simple 30‑minute morning walk backed by science—better heart health, mood, sleep, and energy.
References: Gunes IB, Gunes A. Association Between Eyelid Twitching and Digital Screen Time, Uncorrected Refractive Error, Intraocular Pressure, and Blood Electrolyte Imbalances. Cureus . 2024;16(9):e69249. Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/291035-association-between-eyelid-twitching-and-digital-screen-time-uncorrected-refractive-error-intraocular-pressure-and-blood-electrolyte-imbalances Banik R, Miller NR. Chronic myokymia limited to the eyelid is a benign condition. J Neuroophthalmol . 2004;24(4):290–2. Available from: https://scholars.mssm.edu/en/publications/chronic-myokymia-limited-to-the-eyelid-is-a-benign-condition-2 Hallett M. Blepharospasm: recent advances. Neurology . 2002;59(11):1759–60. Available from: https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/12434791 Defazio G, Livrea P. Epidemiology of primary blepharospasm. Mov Disord . 2002;17(1):7–12. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/11835433 Zeppieri M, Ameer MA, Jahngir MU, Patel BC. Meige Syndrome. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/30020730 Zhang Y, Adamec I, Habek M. Superior oblique myokymia: a meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol . 2018;2018:7290547. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7290547 Costa J, Espírito-Santo C, Borges A, et al. Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2020;11:CD004900. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004900.pub2/abstract Khalkhali M. Topiramate-induced persistent eyelid myokymia. Case Rep Psychiatry . 2016;2016:7901085. Available from: https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4886081/
References: Sen A, Tai XY. Sleep duration and executive function in adults. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023;23:801–813. [link.springer.com] Nature Research Intelligence. Sleep deprivation and cognitive performance. Nature Portfolio. 2023. Available from: https://www.nature.com/… [nature.com] Skourti E, Simos P, Zampetakis A, et al. Long-term associations between objective sleep and verbal memory performance. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1265016. [frontiersin.org] Hauglund NL, Andersen M, Tokarska K, et al. Norepinephrine‑mediated slow vasomotion drives glymphatic clearance during sleep. Cell. 2025;188(3):606‑622.e17. [cell.com] Shirolapov IV, Zakharov AV, Smirnova DA, et al. The role of the glymphatic clearance system in sleep–wake interactions and neurodegeneration. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2024;54:199–204. [link.springer.com] Kong Y, Yu B, Guan G, et al. Effects of sleep deprivation on sports performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2025;16:1544286. [frontiersin.org] Gong M, Sun M, Sun Y, et al. Effects of acute sleep deprivation on sporting performance in athletes. Nat Sci Sleep. 2024;16:—. [tandfonline.com] Dean B, Hartmann T, Wingfield G, et al. Sleep restriction between consecutive days of exercise impairs cycling performance. J Sleep Res. 2023;32(3):e13857. [onlinelibr....wiley.com] Mah CD, Mah KE, Kezirian EJ, Dement WC. The effects of sleep extension on athletic performance in collegiate basketball players. Sleep. 2011;34(7):943–950. [psycnet.apa.org] Cunha LA, Costa JA, Marques EA, et al. Impact of sleep interventions on athletic performance: a systematic review. Sports Med Open. 2023;9:58. [link.springer.com] Teece AR, Beaven CM, Argus CK, et al. Daytime naps improve afternoon power and perceptual measures in elite rugby union athletes. Sleep. 2023;46(12):zsad133. [academic.oup.com] Mesas AE, Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo S, Martinez-Vizcaino V, et al. Daytime napping and cognitive/physical sport performance: meta-analysis of RCTs. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57(7):417–27. [bjsm.bmj.com] Haines Roberts SS, Teo WP, Warmington SA. Effects of training and competition on the sleep of elite athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(8):513–522. [bjsm.bmj.com] Walsh NP, Halson SL, Sargent C, et al. Sleep and the athlete: 2021 expert consensus recommendations. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(7):356–368. [bjsm.bmj.com] Janse van Rensburg DC, Fowler PM, Racinais S. Practical tips to manage travel fatigue and jet lag in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(15):821–822. [bjsm.bmj.com] Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, et al. Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: AASM/SRS consensus statement. Sleep. 2015;38(6):843–844. [aasm.org] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FastStats: Sleep in adults. CDC. 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/… [cdc.gov]
References: Gooley JJ, Chamberlain K, Smith KA, et al. Exposure to room light before bedtime suppresses melatonin onset and shortens melatonin duration in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):E463‑E472. [academic.oup.com] Chang AM, Aeschbach D, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA. Evening use of light‑emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next‑morning alertness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(4):1232‑1237. [hms.harvard.edu] Schöllhorn I, Stefani O, Lucas RJ, et al. Melanopic irradiance defines the impact of evening display light on sleep latency, melatonin and alertness. Commun Biol. 2023;6:1090. [nature.com] He J‑W, Tu Z‑H, Xiao L, Su T, Tang Y‑X. Effect of restricting bedtime mobile phone use on sleep, arousal, mood, and working memory: A randomized pilot trial. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228756. [journals.plos.org] Hartstein LE, Mathew GM, Reichenberger DA, et al. The impact of screen use on sleep health across the lifespan: a National Sleep Foundation consensus statement. Sleep Health. 2024;10(4):373‑384. [sleephealt…ournal.org] Höhn C, Hahn MA, Gruber G, et al. Effects of evening smartphone use on sleep and declarative memory consolidation in male adolescents and young adults. Brain Commun. 2024;6(3):fcae173. Finucane E, O’Brien A, Treweek S, et al. Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep? The People’s Trial—an online, pragmatic randomized trial. Trials. 2021;22:873. [link.springer.com] Ong JC, Manber R, Segal Z, Xia Y, Shapiro S, Wyatt JK. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation for chronic insomnia. Sleep. 2014;37(9):1553‑1563. [academic.oup.com] , [mindfulchair.com] He X, Pan B, Ma N, et al. The association of screen time and the risk of sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2025;16:1640263. Shechter A, Quispe KA, Mizhquiri Barbecho JS, et al. Interventions to reduce short‑wavelength light at night and their effects on sleep: systematic review and meta‑analysis. SLEEP Advances. 2020;1(1):zpaa002. [academic.oup.com]
References: Harkin B, Webb TL, Chang BPI, Prestwich A, Conner M, Kellar I, et al. Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull . 2016;142(2):198–229. Available from: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000025.pdf Compernolle S, DeSmet A, Poppe L, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G, et al. Effectiveness of interventions using self-monitoring to reduce sedentary behavior in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act . 2019;16(1):63. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-019-0824-3 Patel ML, Brooks TL, Bennett GG. Consistent self‑monitoring in a commercial app‑based intervention for weight loss: results from a randomized trial. J Behav Med . 2020;43:391–401. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10865-019-00091-8 Patel ML, Hopkins CM, Brooks TL, Bennett GG. Comparing self-monitoring strategies for weight loss in a smartphone app: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth . 2019;7(2):e12209. Available from: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/2/e12209/ Lally P, Van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol . 2010;40(6):998–1009. Available from: https://repositorio.ispa.pt/bitstream/10400.12/3364/1/IJSP_998-1009.pdf Singh B, Murphy A, Maher C, Smith AE. Time to form a habit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of health behaviour habit formation and its determinants. Healthcare (Basel) . 2024;12(23):2488. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/12/23/2488 Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta‑analysis of effects and processes. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology . 2006;38:69–119. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37367696 Adriaanse MA, Gollwitzer PM, De Ridder DTD, De Wit JBF, Kroese FM. Breaking habits with implementation intentions: A test of underlying processes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull . 2011;37(4):502–13. Available from: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/380229/0146167211399102.pdf Palmer CA, Bower JL, Cho KW, Clementi MA, Lau S, Oosterhoff B, et al. Sleep loss and emotion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 50 years of experimental research. Psychol Bull . 2023;149(11):2314–48. Available from: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bul-bul0000410.pdf Kong Y, Yu B, Guan G, Wang Y, He H. Effects of sleep deprivation on sports performance and perceived exertion in athletes and non-athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol . 2025;16:1544286. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1544286/full Tadros M, Newby JM, Li S, Werner‑Seidler A. Psychological treatments to improve sleep quality in university students: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One . 2025;20(2):e0317125. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317125 Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35‑year odyssey. Am Psychol . 2002;57(9):705–17. Available from: https://med.stanford.edu/content/dam/sm/s-spire/documents/PD.locke-and-latham-retrospective_Paper.pdf
Reference: ACRP. “ICH E6(R2) to ICH E6(R3) Comparison.” (Jan 28, 2025) — terminology & essential records: PDF Clinical Trials Toolkit. “Summary of Key Changes in ICH E6(R3).” (Mar 25, 2025) — proportionality, QbD, safety reporting: Article PharmaEduCenter. “Key changes between ICH GCP E6 R3 and E6 R2.” (Aug 10, 2025) — structure & glossary: Blog CITI Program. “Navigating the Transition from ICH E6(R2) to ICH E6(R3).” (Mar 12, 2025) — consent & site practices: Blog IntuitionLabs. “ICH E6 (R3) Explained.” (Updated Jan 13, 2026) — rationale, data governance: Deep dive
Simplify your day with essentialism: set priorities, eliminate the non‑essential, time‑block deep work, and measure progress for stress‑free productivity.