The Influence of Stress Mindset on Psychological and Physiological Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Recent Evidence (2023–2025)

Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD • February 27, 2026

Share

  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
Abstract
Recent research shows that what people believe about stress—whether they see it as harmful or potentially helpful—can meaningfully influence how they think, feel, and perform under pressure. New evidence from 2023 to 2025 reveals that a stress‑is‑enhancing mindset is associated with lower psychological distress, better emotional wellbeing, and modest improvements in performance. Metacognitive interventions that provide balanced information about stress appear especially effective in helping people adopt and maintain more adaptive stress beliefs.

1. Introduction

For decades, stress has been viewed primarily as harmful. However, recent research shows that individuals’ stress mindsets —their core beliefs about whether stress helps or harms—play a significant role in shaping their actual stress responses. A stress‑is‑enhancing mindset does not eliminate stress; rather, it changes how people interpret and respond to it. Studies conducted between 2023 and 2025 consistently show that stress mindsets influence emotional wellbeing, coping, and even physical responses to stress.


2. Stress Mindset and Psychological Outcomes

2.1 Stress Mindset and Psychological Pain

A large 2025 study of over 2,000 medical students found that students with a more stress‑is‑enhancing mindset reported lower psychological pain. This effect was explained by two key processes:
  • Cognitive reappraisal — reinterpreting stressful situations in healthier ways
  • Self‑identity — a stronger sense of personal coherence
These two mechanisms independently and jointly mediated the connection between stress mindset and psychological pain.

2.2 Improvements in Emotional Wellbeing After Intervention

A four‑month stress‑mindset intervention in 427 first‑year university students (2025) led to:
  • Increased stress‑is‑enhancing beliefs
  • Reduced negative affect
  • Improved life satisfaction
Some benefits continued months later due to stronger stress‑is‑enhancing mindsets.

These findings show how stress beliefs shape everyday emotional functioning, especially during major life transitions.


3. Stress Mindset and Performance Outcomes

3.1 Meta‑Analysis Findings (2024)

A 2024 meta‑analysis of 44 randomized trials found small but reliable performance improvements (d = 0.23) after stress‑mindset interventions.

Key findings:
  • Mixed interventions produced the strongest improvements (d = 0.45)
  • Public performance tasks benefited most (e.g., presentations)
This shows that enhancing stress beliefs is especially useful in high‑pressure, socially evaluative environments.

3.2 Academic Performance and Motivation (2024)

A randomized study of 210 college students showed that stress‑is‑enhancing interventions increased adaptive stress beliefs, reduced stress, and improved academic motivation. Combining growth mindset + stress mindset strategies yielded the best results across all outcomes.


4. Mechanisms: How Stress Mindset Shapes Responses

4.1 Metacognitive Interventions Provide Durable Benefits

Randomized studies from 2023 introduced a metacognitive approach —teaching participants balanced information about stress and how mindsets work.

This led to:
  • Greater increases in stress‑is‑enhancing beliefs
  • Improved physical health symptoms
  • Better interpersonal performance
These benefits were more durable than traditional positive‑only stress messaging.

4.2 Physiological Responses: Cardiovascular Benefits

Another randomized trial found that reframing stress‑arousal resulted in more adaptive physiological patterns:

  • Higher cardiac output
  • Lower vascular resistance

This indicates a healthier, challenge‑oriented stress response.

4.3 Daily Stress and Affect

A daily diary study showed that people with negative stress beliefs experienced:

  • Stronger negative emotional reactions
  • Greater distress from minor stressors

Those with more adaptive stress beliefs had lower negative affect and more positive emotional responses to daily challenges.


5. Implications for Interventions

Evidence across studies shows that:
  • Brief, scalable interventions can shift stress beliefs and improve wellbeing
  • They are especially effective during high‑stress transitions(e.g., starting university)
  • Balanced, metacognitive approaches help people maintain adaptive mindsets even when stress feels overwhelming

6. Conclusions

Recent research strongly supports that stress mindsets shape psychological wellbeing, daily emotions, physiological reactions, and performance. Stress‑is‑enhancing mindsets—especially when supported by effective interventions—are linked to:

  • Better emotional health
  • Lower psychological pain
  • Improved performance
  • More adaptive physiological responses

This evidence suggests stress‑mindset training can improve how students, professionals, and organizations navigate stress.


📝 Quick Quiz: Test Your Understanding!

1. What is a stress mindset?




2. Do stress‑is‑enhancing mindsets improve performance?




3. Which intervention type is most effective?




Scroll back up to check your answers! 💡


References:


  1. Qiang S, Wu J, Zheng D, et al. The effect of stress mindset on psychological pain: the chain mediating roles of cognitive reappraisal and self-identity. Front Psychol. 2025;16. 1 
  2. Bosshard M, Gomez P. Effectiveness of stress arousal reappraisal and stressisenhancing mindset interventions on task performance outcomes: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024. 2 
  3. Zhao S, Chen P, Jin L, et al. Unlocking Emotional Well-Being: Evaluation of a Stress Mindset Intervention With a Metacognitive Approach. Emotion. 2025;25(5):1169–1184. 4 
  4. Meyer HH, Stutts LA. The Effect of Mindset Interventions on Stress and Academic Motivation in College Students. Innov High Educ. 2024;49:783–798. 7 
  5. Crum AJ, Santoro E, Handley-Miner I, et al. Evaluation of the “Rethink Stress” Mindset Intervention: A Metacognitive Approach to Changing Mindsets. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023. 3 
  6. Laferton JAC, Fischer S, Ebert DD, et al. The Effects of Stress Beliefs on Daily Affective Stress Responses. Ann Behav Med. 2020;54(4):258–267. 5 
  7. UCSF Stress Measurement Network. Beliefs about Stress. 2026. 6 




List of Services

    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD

    Mohamad Ali Salloum LinkedIn Profile

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.

    Share

    Recent articles:

    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 24, 2026
    References: Qiang S, Wu J, Zheng D, et al. The effect of stress mindset on psychological pain: the chain mediating roles of cognitive reappraisal and self-identity. Front Psychol. 2025;16. 1 Bosshard M, Gomez P. Effectiveness of stress arousal reappraisal and stressisenhancing mindset interventions on task performance outcomes: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024. 2 Zhao S, Chen P, Jin L, et al. Unlocking Emotional Well-Being: Evaluation of a Stress Mindset Intervention With a Metacognitive Approach. Emotion. 2025;25(5):1169–1184. 4 Meyer HH, Stutts LA. The Effect of Mindset Interventions on Stress and Academic Motivation in College Students. Innov High Educ. 2024;49:783–798. 7 Crum AJ, Santoro E, Handley-Miner I, et al. Evaluation of the “Rethink Stress” Mindset Intervention: A Metacognitive Approach to Changing Mindsets. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023. 3 Laferton JAC, Fischer S, Ebert DD, et al. The Effects of Stress Beliefs on Daily Affective Stress Responses. Ann Behav Med. 2020;54(4):258–267. 5 UCSF Stress Measurement Network. Beliefs about Stress . 2026. 6
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 14, 2026
    A clear, evidence‑based guide to Ramadan fasting, explaining its metabolic, mental, and cardiometabolic benefits, plus practical nutrition, hydration, sleep, and medication strategies for healthy adults and high‑risk patients.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 13, 2026
    A practical guide to shifting from blaming “human error” to applying ICH GCP E6(R3) system‑level quality, Quality by Design, and risk‑based oversight to prevent repeat deviations in clinical trials.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 10, 2026
    Learn 5 Whys and Fishbone (Ishikawa) for Root Cause Analysis in clinical research, with practical examples and an interactive quiz—no fluff, just clarity.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 9, 2026
    A clear, practical guide to CAPA for Clinical Research Associates—covering corrective and preventive actions, real‑world scenarios, and an interactive quiz to reinforce learning.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 5, 2026
    Boost your health with a simple 30‑minute morning walk backed by science—better heart health, mood, sleep, and energy.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 3, 2026
    References: Gunes IB, Gunes A. Association Between Eyelid Twitching and Digital Screen Time, Uncorrected Refractive Error, Intraocular Pressure, and Blood Electrolyte Imbalances. Cureus . 2024;16(9):e69249. Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/291035-association-between-eyelid-twitching-and-digital-screen-time-uncorrected-refractive-error-intraocular-pressure-and-blood-electrolyte-imbalances Banik R, Miller NR. Chronic myokymia limited to the eyelid is a benign condition. J Neuroophthalmol . 2004;24(4):290–2. Available from: https://scholars.mssm.edu/en/publications/chronic-myokymia-limited-to-the-eyelid-is-a-benign-condition-2 Hallett M. Blepharospasm: recent advances. Neurology . 2002;59(11):1759–60. Available from: https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/12434791 Defazio G, Livrea P. Epidemiology of primary blepharospasm. Mov Disord . 2002;17(1):7–12. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/11835433 Zeppieri M, Ameer MA, Jahngir MU, Patel BC. Meige Syndrome. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/30020730 Zhang Y, Adamec I, Habek M. Superior oblique myokymia: a meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol . 2018;2018:7290547. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7290547 Costa J, Espírito-Santo C, Borges A, et al. Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2020;11:CD004900. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004900.pub2/abstract Khalkhali M. Topiramate-induced persistent eyelid myokymia. Case Rep Psychiatry . 2016;2016:7901085. Available from: https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4886081/
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD February 1, 2026
    References: Sen A, Tai XY. Sleep duration and executive function in adults. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023;23:801–813. [link.springer.com] Nature Research Intelligence. Sleep deprivation and cognitive performance. Nature Portfolio. 2023. Available from: https://www.nature.com/… [nature.com] Skourti E, Simos P, Zampetakis A, et al. Long-term associations between objective sleep and verbal memory performance. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1265016. [frontiersin.org] Hauglund NL, Andersen M, Tokarska K, et al. Norepinephrine‑mediated slow vasomotion drives glymphatic clearance during sleep. Cell. 2025;188(3):606‑622.e17. [cell.com] Shirolapov IV, Zakharov AV, Smirnova DA, et al. The role of the glymphatic clearance system in sleep–wake interactions and neurodegeneration. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2024;54:199–204. [link.springer.com] Kong Y, Yu B, Guan G, et al. Effects of sleep deprivation on sports performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2025;16:1544286. [frontiersin.org] Gong M, Sun M, Sun Y, et al. Effects of acute sleep deprivation on sporting performance in athletes. Nat Sci Sleep. 2024;16:—. [tandfonline.com] Dean B, Hartmann T, Wingfield G, et al. Sleep restriction between consecutive days of exercise impairs cycling performance. J Sleep Res. 2023;32(3):e13857. [onlinelibr....wiley.com] Mah CD, Mah KE, Kezirian EJ, Dement WC. The effects of sleep extension on athletic performance in collegiate basketball players. Sleep. 2011;34(7):943–950. [psycnet.apa.org] Cunha LA, Costa JA, Marques EA, et al. Impact of sleep interventions on athletic performance: a systematic review. Sports Med Open. 2023;9:58. [link.springer.com] Teece AR, Beaven CM, Argus CK, et al. Daytime naps improve afternoon power and perceptual measures in elite rugby union athletes. Sleep. 2023;46(12):zsad133. [academic.oup.com] Mesas AE, Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo S, Martinez-Vizcaino V, et al. Daytime napping and cognitive/physical sport performance: meta-analysis of RCTs. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57(7):417–27. [bjsm.bmj.com] Haines Roberts SS, Teo WP, Warmington SA. Effects of training and competition on the sleep of elite athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(8):513–522. [bjsm.bmj.com] Walsh NP, Halson SL, Sargent C, et al. Sleep and the athlete: 2021 expert consensus recommendations. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(7):356–368. [bjsm.bmj.com] Janse van Rensburg DC, Fowler PM, Racinais S. Practical tips to manage travel fatigue and jet lag in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(15):821–822. [bjsm.bmj.com] Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, et al. Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: AASM/SRS consensus statement. Sleep. 2015;38(6):843–844. [aasm.org] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FastStats: Sleep in adults. CDC. 2024. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/… [cdc.gov]
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD January 30, 2026
    References: Gooley JJ, Chamberlain K, Smith KA, et al. Exposure to room light before bedtime suppresses melatonin onset and shortens melatonin duration in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):E463‑E472. [academic.oup.com] Chang AM, Aeschbach D, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA. Evening use of light‑emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next‑morning alertness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(4):1232‑1237. [hms.harvard.edu] Schöllhorn I, Stefani O, Lucas RJ, et al. Melanopic irradiance defines the impact of evening display light on sleep latency, melatonin and alertness. Commun Biol. 2023;6:1090. [nature.com] He J‑W, Tu Z‑H, Xiao L, Su T, Tang Y‑X. Effect of restricting bedtime mobile phone use on sleep, arousal, mood, and working memory: A randomized pilot trial. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228756. [journals.plos.org] Hartstein LE, Mathew GM, Reichenberger DA, et al. The impact of screen use on sleep health across the lifespan: a National Sleep Foundation consensus statement. Sleep Health. 2024;10(4):373‑384. [sleephealt…ournal.org] Höhn C, Hahn MA, Gruber G, et al. Effects of evening smartphone use on sleep and declarative memory consolidation in male adolescents and young adults. Brain Commun. 2024;6(3):fcae173. Finucane E, O’Brien A, Treweek S, et al. Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep? The People’s Trial—an online, pragmatic randomized trial. Trials. 2021;22:873. [link.springer.com] Ong JC, Manber R, Segal Z, Xia Y, Shapiro S, Wyatt JK. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation for chronic insomnia. Sleep. 2014;37(9):1553‑1563. [academic.oup.com] , [mindfulchair.com] He X, Pan B, Ma N, et al. The association of screen time and the risk of sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2025;16:1640263. Shechter A, Quispe KA, Mizhquiri Barbecho JS, et al. Interventions to reduce short‑wavelength light at night and their effects on sleep: systematic review and meta‑analysis. SLEEP Advances. 2020;1(1):zpaa002. [academic.oup.com]
    More Posts