Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.
How Using this CBT Method Helps Us Understand the Root Cause of Low Mood
Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD • March 16, 2026
Share
🧭 CBT • Cross‑Sectional Formulation
When your mood drops, it often feels like it “just happens.”
In CBT, low mood isn’t random — it follows a predictable pattern of four interconnected elements: thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and physical sensations.
💭 Thoughts
The interpretations, images, and self‑talk that color your experience.
💗 Emotions
Felt states like anxiety, sadness, shame, or calm.
🧍 Behaviors
What you do or avoid — from procrastination to approach.
🌡️ Physical sensations
Body signals such as tension, fatigue, or an upset stomach.
This framework is called a cross‑sectional formulation —a “here‑and‑now” map of how the parts influence each other (often a “vicious cycle”).
The Four‑Part Loop (Interactive Diagram)
Thoughts
Emotions
Behaviors
Physical sensations
Tip: Break the loop at any point to shift the pattern.
The Science Behind It: Why the Model Works
It is not events themselves that cause our emotions, but our interpretation of those events.
— Beck’s Cognitive Theory
- Thoughts shape emotions(appraisals → feelings)
- Emotions influence behavior(what we do or avoid)
- Behaviors affect body state(tension, fatigue, activation)
- Body sensations can reinforce thoughts(e.g., “tight chest → I must be in danger”)
Together, these links create a self‑maintaining loop of low mood—until one part changes.
A Real‑Life Example: Layla’s Story
Layla is a university student preparing a presentation. She sees an email reminder about tomorrow’s talk.
💭 Thoughts (Cognitions)
- “I’m going to embarrass myself.”
- “Everyone will think I’m incompetent.”
These are negative automatic thoughts.
💗 Emotions
- Anxiety
- Sadness
- Shame
Emotions reflect the interpretation, not the event itself.
🧍 Behaviors
- Procrastinates
- Cancels dinner plans
- Withdraws from friends
Avoidance often maintains low mood.
🌡️ Physical sensations
- Tight chest
- Fatigue
- Upset stomach
Body signals can amplify worry if misread.
🧩 What the map reveals
Thoughts: “I will fail.” → Emotions: Anxiety → sadness → Behaviors: Avoid preparation → Physical: Fatigue & tension.
The core issue isn’t the presentation; it’s the interpretation of it. Change at any point weakens the loop.
A Second Example: Daily Scenario
Trigger: A friend doesn’t reply for hours.
💭 Thoughts
“She’s upset with me.” “I did something wrong.”
💗 Emotions
Worry → sadness.
🧍 Behaviors
Over‑checking phone, withdrawing, ruminating.
🌡️ Physical sensations
Stomach tightness, restlessness.
The problem isn’t the silence; it’s the assumption that silence = rejection (a common cognitive distortion).
Why This Model Works So Well
- Clarifies distress collaboratively and concretely
- Identifies maintaining processes(e.g., avoidance, rumination)
- Highlights targets for change(thoughts, actions, body)
- Boosts a sense of control through understanding alone
Try It Yourself: Map Your Moment
Pick a recent moment when your mood dipped. Fill in each box, then draw arrows in your mind (or on paper) to show how each part influenced the next.
🌟 Example (filled)
Thoughts:
“If I start, I’ll discover I can’t do it.”
Emotions:
Anxiety (55%), Hopeless (20%)
Behaviors:
Delay task, open unrelated tabs
Physical:
Chest tightness, shallow breathing
Now choose one change: balanced reframe, 10‑minute starter task, or a breathing reset.
Quick Quiz: Test Your Understanding
1. In a cross‑sectional formulation, which four elements form the loop?
CBT maps the here‑and‑now cycle: thoughts, emotions, behaviors, and body sensations.
2. According to CBT, what most directly drives emotion?
Beck’s model emphasizes how appraisal (interpretation) shapes emotional responses.
3. Which behavior most commonly maintains low mood in these examples?
Avoidance removes short‑term discomfort but prolongs the cycle.
4. Which of the following is a physical sensation in the cycle?
Thoughts are cognitions; emotions are feelings; body sensations include tension, fatigue, etc.
5. To start breaking the loop today , which is a practical move?
Small approach behaviors begin to weaken avoidance‑driven cycles.
💡 Map it, spot a change point, take one small step. Loops can be broken.
References:
- Think CBT. How to Use the Crosssectional CBT Model. 2026. Available from: https://thinkcbt.com 1
- University of Toledo Counseling Center. CBT Model. 2024. Available from: https://www.utoledo.edu/studentaffairs/counseling/getting-unstuck/CBT-model.html 2
- Beck AT. Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. SAGE Journals summary (InnovAiT, 6(9), 579–585). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1755738012471029 3
- Psychology Tools. Cognitive Behavioral Model. 2026. Available from: https://www.psychologytools.com/resource/cognitive-behavioral-model 4
List of Services
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD
Share
Recent articles:
References: McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med . 2014;371(11):993–1004. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med . 2007;357:2109–2122. Kastelein JJP, Akdim F, Stroes ESG, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:1431–1443. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:2545–2559. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. N Engl J Med . 1991;324:781–788. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. N Engl J Med . 2020;383:1413–1424. Ioannidis JPA. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: are we being misled? BMJ . 2013;346:f314.
References: Wager TD, Atlas LY. The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2015;16(7):403‑18. Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F, Pagnini F. Placebo and nocebo effects associated with pharmacological interventions: an umbrella review. BMJ Open . 2023;13:e077243. Colloca L, Finniss D. Nocebo effects, patient‑clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes. JAMA . 2012;307(6):567‑8. Howard JP, Wood FA, Finegold JA, et al. Side effect patterns in a blinded, randomized trial of statin, placebo, and no treatment. N Engl J Med . 2021;385(23):2180‑9. Penson PE, Mancini GBJ, Toth PP, et al. Introducing the “drucebo” effect in statin therapy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle . 2018;9(6):1023‑33. Barnes K, Faasse K, Geers AL, et al. Can positive framing reduce nocebo side effects? Front Pharmacol . 2019;10:167. Caliskan EB, Bingel U, Kunkel A. Translating knowledge on placebo and nocebo effects into clinical practice. Pain Rep . 2024;9(2):e1142. von Wernsdorff M, Loef M, Tuschen‑Caffier B, Schmidt S. Effects of open‑label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Sci Rep . 2021;11:3855.
References: Zaniletti I, Larson DR, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Maradit Kremers H. How to distinguish correlation from causation in orthopaedic research. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(4):634–637. Rush J, Ajami M, Look KA, Margolis A. Statistics review part 10: causality and confounding. J Pharm Soc Wis. 2014;17(1):45–52. Koopmans E, Schiller C. Understanding causation in healthcare: an introduction to critical realism. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(8–9):1207–1214. Kahlert J, Gribsholt SB, Gammelager H, Dekkers OM, Luta G. Control of confounding in the analysis phase – an overview for clinicians. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:195–204. Shi AX, Zivich PN, Chu H. A comprehensive review and tutorial on confounding adjustment methods for estimating treatment effects using observational data. Appl Sci (Basel). 2024;14(9):3662. Gao Y, Xiang L, Yi H, Song J, Sun D, Xu B, et al. Confounder adjustment in observational studies investigating multiple risk factors: a methodological study. BMC Med. 2025;23:132. Ho FK, Brown J, Galwey NW. Regression adjustment for causal inference. BMJ Med. 2025;4:e000816. Correia LCL, Mascarenhas RF, Menezes FSC, Oliveira Junior JS, Vaccarino V, Ross JS, et al. Confounder selection in observational studies in high‑impact medical and epidemiological journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(7):e2524176.
Explore the difference between Sensitivity and Specificity
References: Zaniletti I, Larson DR, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Maradit Kremers H. How to Distinguish Correlation from Causation in Orthopaedic Research. J Arthroplasty. 2022;38(4):634‑637. [pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] Association of Health Care Journalists. Correlation vs. Causation. [healthjournalism.org] Rush J, Ajami M, Look K, Margolis A. Statistics Review Part 10: Causality and Confounding. J Pharm Soc Wis. [jpswi.org] Biostat Prime. Correlation vs Causation: Meaning, Differences & Examples. [biostatprime.com] Koopmans E, Schiller C. Understanding Causation in Healthcare: An Introduction to Critical Realism. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(8–9):1207–1214. [pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]
References: Very Big Brain. Somatic Memories: How Physical Sensations Trigger Past Memories and Emotions . 2023 Nov 26. [verybigbrain.com] Misattribution of arousal. Wikipedia . 2026. [en.wikipedia.org] Zimbardo P. The Misattribution of Arousal Study (Dutton & Aron) . 2026. [zimbardo.com] Higgins L. Why You Feel Anxious After Drinking Coffee . TIME. 2025 Nov 11. [time.com] Double KS. Metacognitive ability is associated with reduced emotion suppression . Scientific Reports. 2026 Jan 28. [nature.com] Merkebu J et al. What is metacognitive reflection? Front Educ. 2023 Apr 5. [researchgate.net] Meyers S et al. Cognitive Reappraisal is More Effective for Regulating Emotions than Moods . Affective Science. 2025 Jun 6. [link.springer.com]
Are they the same?
A Practical Guide for the Public.
Did you know that your emotions are just suggestions?
Short-form videos like Reels and TikTok rapidly trigger dopamine, stress, and attention circuits—discover how they impact your brain, mood, and focus, plus practical tips to restore balance.