Are Your Thoughts and Emotions Facts — or Suggestions From Your Brain?

Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD • April 27, 2026

Share

  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button
  • Slide title

    Write your caption here
    Button

In a previous article "Why Your Emotions Are Really Just Your Brain's Best Guess", we explored a surprising idea: your emotions are not objective truth — they’re your brain’s best guess.

They’re interpretations built from:

  • bodily sensations
  • past experiences
  • context
  • expectations

If that idea landed for you, the next question almost asks itself:

What about our thoughts?
If emotions are guesses… are thoughts any different?


🌍 Zooming Out: Why the Brain Doesn’t Care About “Truth”

Your brain’s primary job is not to tell the truth.

It’s not designed to be a philosopher or a journalist.

Its real job is simpler and more urgent:

Keep you alive efficiently.

To do that, your brain constantly predicts:

  • what’s happening
  • what might happen next
  • whether something is safe or dangerous

Waiting for perfect information would be too slow. So instead, the brain fills in the gaps.

This means your inner experience — thoughts and emotions — is shaped less like a camera recording and more like a weather forecast.

Useful. Often accurate. But never guaranteed.


🧠 From Emotions to Thoughts: Same System, Different Output

In the first article, we focused on emotions as interpretations of internal and external data.

Thoughts come from the same predictive machinery.

When your brain senses uncertainty, discomfort, or ambiguity, it asks:

“What’s going on?”

And then it answers — quickly.

  • “I feel tense → I’m probably failing.”
  • “My chest feels tight → something bad is about to happen.”
  • “I feel unmotivated → I must be lazy.”

These thoughts aren’t random. They’re attempts to explain sensations.

Just like emotions.


🧩 Why Thoughts Feel More “True” Than Emotions

Most people are eventually willing to question emotions:

“Maybe I’m just emotional.”

Thoughts feel different.

They use language. Logic. Narratives.

They sound reasonable.

That’s because thoughts reduce uncertainty.

A story — even a negative one — often feels safer than not knowing.

Certainty feels calming. Even false certainty.


❤️ Interoception Again: The Body Still Leads the Story

Just like emotions, thoughts are deeply influenced by bodily signals.

When your body is:

  • tired
  • overstimulated
  • caffeinated
  • stressed

Your thoughts tend to become:

  • more catastrophic
  • more rigid
  • more absolute

The brain senses internal discomfort and generates explanations that match that discomfort.

The thought isn’t random. It’s the brain trying to make sense of the body.


⚠️ What Science Knows — and What It’s Still Figuring Out

Strong evidence supports:

  • predictive processing as a core brain principle
  • the role of interoception in emotion
  • the interaction between thoughts and emotions
  • the usefulness of metacognition for regulation

Still debated or developing:

  • whether emotions are fully innate or mostly learned
  • how universal emotional categories truly are
  • how dominant prediction is in all situations

This matters because it keeps us humble:

Powerful framework — not absolute truth.


🔑 The Resolution: How to Separate Thoughts & Emotions From Facts

This is where insight becomes useful.

If thoughts and emotions are suggestions, not facts — how do you live that way?

The goal is not suppression.

The goal is discernment.


🧠 Step 1: Change the Relationship, Not the Content

Instead of asking:

“Is this thought true?”

Try asking:

“What is my brain trying to explain right now?”

This moves the thought from verdict to hypothesis.


🔍 Step 2: Separate Data From Story

Raw data:

  • heart rate increased
  • muscles tense
  • mental speed increased

The story:

  • “I’m failing.”
  • “This is dangerous.”
  • “I can’t handle this.”

The brain jumps automatically.

You don’t stop the jump — you notice it.


🧠 Step 3: Metacognition — The Bird’s‑Eye View

Metacognition means seeing thoughts and emotions as mental events.

Instead of:

“I am anxious.”

You get:

“Anxiety is present.”

This small shift reduces emotional fusion and restores choice.


🧪 Step 4: Treat Thoughts Like Suggestions

Thoughts often sound urgent.

Urgency does not equal accuracy.

A helpful reframe:

“This is one possible explanation my brain is offering.”

You don’t need to argue. You don’t need to obey. You evaluate.


🧘 Step 5: Regulate the Body to Clarify the Mind

Because thoughts are built on bodily signals, changing the body changes interpretation.

  • slow breathing
  • brief movement
  • hydration
  • reducing caffeine when anxious

You’re not “fixing thoughts.” You’re changing the input.


🦅 The Bigger Picture

When thoughts and emotions stop being facts, something powerful happens.

You gain flexibility.

You can feel fear — and still act wisely. You can think a negative thought — and not become it.

Your brain keeps making suggestions. You get the final vote.


✅ Final Takeaway

Thoughts and emotions feel real because your brain is trying to protect you efficiently — not because they are always accurate.

They are meaningful. They are informative. They are powerful.

But they are not facts.

And when you learn to see them as suggestions rather than commands, you don’t lose depth — you gain clarity.

``

References:

  1. Very Big Brain. Somatic Memories: How Physical Sensations Trigger Past Memories and Emotions. 2023 Nov 26. [verybigbrain.com] 
  2. Misattribution of arousal. Wikipedia. 2026. [en.wikipedia.org] 
  3. Zimbardo P. The Misattribution of Arousal Study (Dutton & Aron). 2026. [zimbardo.com] 
  4. Higgins L. Why You Feel Anxious After Drinking Coffee. TIME. 2025 Nov 11. [time.com] 
  5. Double KS. Metacognitive ability is associated with reduced emotion suppression. Scientific Reports. 2026 Jan 28. [nature.com] 
  6. Merkebu J et al. What is metacognitive reflection? Front Educ. 2023 Apr 5. [researchgate.net] 
  7. Meyers S et al. Cognitive Reappraisal is More Effective for Regulating Emotions than Moods. Affective Science. 2025 Jun 6. [link.springer.com] 

List of Services

    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button
    • Slide title

      Write your caption here
      Button

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD

    Mohamad Ali Salloum LinkedIn Profile

    Mohamad-Ali Salloum is a Pharmacist and science writer. He loves simplifying science to the general public and healthcare students through words and illustrations. When he's not working, you can usually find him in the gym, reading a book, or learning a new skill.

    Share

    Recent articles:

    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 17, 2026
    References: Wood W, Quinn JM, Kashy DA. Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. J Pers Soc Psychol . 2002;83(6):1281–1297. Wood W, Neal DT. The habitual consumer. J Consum Psychol . 2009;19(4):579–592. Neal DT, Wood W, Labrecque JS, Lally P. How do habits guide behavior? Perceived and actual triggers of habits in daily life. J Exp Soc Psychol . 2012;48(2):492–498. Wood W, Mazar A, Neal DT. Habits and goals in human behavior: Separate but interacting systems. Perspect Psychol Sci . 2021;16(1):1–16. Graybiel AM. Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu Rev Neurosci . 2008;31:359–387. Smith KS, Graybiel AM. Habit formation. Dialogues Clin Neurosci . 2016;18(1):33–43. Yin HH, Knowlton BJ. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2006;7(6):464–476. Graybiel AM. The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiol Learn Mem . 1998;70(1–2):119–136. Schultz W. Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues Clin Neurosci . 2016;18(1):23–32. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science . 1997;275(5306):1593–1599. Nasser HM, Calu DJ, Schoenbaum G, Sharpe MJ. The dopamine prediction error: Contributions to associative models of reward learning. Front Psychol . 2017;8:244. Kahnt T, Schoenbaum G. The curious case of dopaminergic prediction errors and learning associative information beyond value. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2025;26:169–178. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J Soc Psychol . 2010;40(6):998–1009. American Psychological Association. Harnessing the power of habits. Monitor Psychol . 2020;51(8):78–83.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 15, 2026
    References: Baddeley A. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol . 2012;63:1–29. Chai WJ, Abd Hamid AI, Malin Abdullah J. Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: a review. Front Psychol . 2018;9:401. Rogers RD, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen . 1995;124(2):207–231. Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform . 2001;27(4):763–797. Garner KG, Dux PE. Knowledge generalization and the costs of multitasking. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2023;24:98–112. Zhou X, Lei X. Wandering minds with wandering brain networks. Neurosci Bull . 2018;34(6):1017–1028. Sorella S, Crescentini C, Matiz A, et al. Resting‑state default mode network variability predicts spontaneous mind‑wandering. Front Hum Neurosci . 2025;19:1515902. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci . 1988;12(2):257–285. 
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 13, 2026
    Why do we procrastinate even when tasks matter most? Discover the emotional roots of procrastination and how to stop
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 11, 2026
    Confidence and self-esteem are often confused but are psychologically distinct. Learn how they differ, how each develops, and why understanding both matters for real growth.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 9, 2026
    Confidence isn’t about eliminating fear—it’s about acting despite it. Discover how courage, discomfort, and psychological growth build real confidence over time.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 7, 2026
    References: McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med . 2014;371(11):993–1004. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med . 2007;357:2109–2122. Kastelein JJP, Akdim F, Stroes ESG, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:1431–1443. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med . 2008;358:2545–2559. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. N Engl J Med . 1991;324:781–788. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. N Engl J Med . 2020;383:1413–1424. Ioannidis JPA. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: are we being misled? BMJ . 2013;346:f314.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 4, 2026
    References: Wager TD, Atlas LY. The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health. Nat Rev Neurosci . 2015;16(7):403‑18. Frisaldi E, Shaibani A, Benedetti F, Pagnini F. Placebo and nocebo effects associated with pharmacological interventions: an umbrella review. BMJ Open . 2023;13:e077243. Colloca L, Finniss D. Nocebo effects, patient‑clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes. JAMA . 2012;307(6):567‑8. Howard JP, Wood FA, Finegold JA, et al. Side effect patterns in a blinded, randomized trial of statin, placebo, and no treatment. N Engl J Med . 2021;385(23):2180‑9. Penson PE, Mancini GBJ, Toth PP, et al. Introducing the “drucebo” effect in statin therapy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle . 2018;9(6):1023‑33. Barnes K, Faasse K, Geers AL, et al. Can positive framing reduce nocebo side effects? Front Pharmacol . 2019;10:167. Caliskan EB, Bingel U, Kunkel A. Translating knowledge on placebo and nocebo effects into clinical practice. Pain Rep . 2024;9(2):e1142. von Wernsdorff M, Loef M, Tuschen‑Caffier B, Schmidt S. Effects of open‑label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Sci Rep . 2021;11:3855.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 4, 2026
    References: Zaniletti I, Larson DR, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Maradit Kremers H. How to distinguish correlation from causation in orthopaedic research. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(4):634–637. Rush J, Ajami M, Look KA, Margolis A. Statistics review part 10: causality and confounding. J Pharm Soc Wis. 2014;17(1):45–52. Koopmans E, Schiller C. Understanding causation in healthcare: an introduction to critical realism. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(8–9):1207–1214. Kahlert J, Gribsholt SB, Gammelager H, Dekkers OM, Luta G. Control of confounding in the analysis phase – an overview for clinicians. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:195–204. Shi AX, Zivich PN, Chu H. A comprehensive review and tutorial on confounding adjustment methods for estimating treatment effects using observational data. Appl Sci (Basel). 2024;14(9):3662. Gao Y, Xiang L, Yi H, Song J, Sun D, Xu B, et al. Confounder adjustment in observational studies investigating multiple risk factors: a methodological study. BMC Med. 2025;23:132. Ho FK, Brown J, Galwey NW. Regression adjustment for causal inference. BMJ Med. 2025;4:e000816. Correia LCL, Mascarenhas RF, Menezes FSC, Oliveira Junior JS, Vaccarino V, Ross JS, et al. Confounder selection in observational studies in high‑impact medical and epidemiological journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(7):e2524176.
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD May 1, 2026
    Explore the difference between Sensitivity and Specificity
    By Mohamad-Ali Salloum, PharmD April 29, 2026
    References: Zaniletti I, Larson DR, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Maradit Kremers H. How to Distinguish Correlation from Causation in Orthopaedic Research. J Arthroplasty. 2022;38(4):634‑637. [pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] Association of Health Care Journalists. Correlation vs. Causation. [healthjournalism.org] Rush J, Ajami M, Look K, Margolis A. Statistics Review Part 10: Causality and Confounding. J Pharm Soc Wis. [jpswi.org] Biostat Prime. Correlation vs Causation: Meaning, Differences & Examples. [biostatprime.com] Koopmans E, Schiller C. Understanding Causation in Healthcare: An Introduction to Critical Realism. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(8–9):1207–1214. [pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov] 
    More Posts